User talk:158.169.40.9

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Peć, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:48, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Paris. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. —jameslucas (" " / +) 13:51, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

You need to say more about the competition, not just give a list of winners, because the article is about the competition, not about the winners. To do that, you will need to find articles (news, journals) that talk about the competition and why it is important. Use those to create the WP page. If the competition has its own list of winners, point to that rather than add them to the page, because they will update their list each year, and the WP article will probably get out of date.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:International Arthur Grumiaux Competition and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 00:10, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! 158.169.40.9, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 00:10, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devopam was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Arthur Grumiaux. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:International Arthur Grumiaux Competition and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devopam (talk) 18:00, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

You have a bunch of links at the end that aren't included in references. Those links need to be deleted - but if you can include content from them and references, that would be better.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:International Arthur Grumiaux Competition and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 22:30, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Prostitution law, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:51, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Draft:International Grumiaux Violin Competition, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://wiki.polskibreivik.pl/page_Draft:International_Arthur_Grumiaux_Competition.html.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:06, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Arthur Grumiaux has been reverted.
Your edit here to Arthur Grumiaux was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKJy9e-1DWj4HHoVzq6PK7A) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 13:33, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Arthur_Grumiaux#Competition instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:International Grumiaux Violin Competition and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 18:56, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RadioFan was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:International Arthur Grumiaux Competition and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RadioFan (talk) 03:26, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Insertcleverphrasehere was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment they left was:

Nothing has changed since the last review...

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:International Arthur Grumiaux Competition and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 InsertCleverPhraseHere  09:19, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:International Arthur Grumiaux Competition. Thanks! LaMona (talk) 14:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This article was declined three times in the past, but you have removed that information. Do not do that - we need that to give us the information from previous reviewers. I will try to recapture some of it, but it's going to be difficult.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:International Arthur Grumiaux Competition and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 14:42, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gaza Holocaust. Since you had some involvement with the Gaza Holocaust redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — PinkAmpers&^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 03:31, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add identical material such as this to multiple articles. It can't be true for all of the articles you added it to, and in any case it is completely unsourced. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:01, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 158.169.40.9. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "International Arthur Grumiaux Competition".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TopCipher (talk) 05:49, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Gavin Davis, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 15:21, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

Good morning,

would it be possible update following info on the page? The info displayed now dates from 2015. Here you go with the updated figure:

Employees: 3,848(October 2019) Annual budget: 694.832.516 EUR (October 2019)

Thank you in advance, Ada — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.169.40.9 (talk) 08:41, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm checking with the blocking editor to see if this request is actionable. In the meantime, the name of the article has not been given. If you could provide it, along with a verifying reference, that would be helpful.
• Please remember to sign all posts, even on the IP's talk page, using 4 tildes ⇧ Shift+~ x4.
• When ready to proceed with the requested information, kindly change the {{request edit}} template's answer parameter to read from |ans=yes to |ans=no.

Regards,  Spintendo  13:00, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Update: The request is actionable and I'm prepared to implement it, seeing as how it's only an update of the employee count and a financial figure. However, the requesting editor did not name the article in question nor did they provide a reference. Without that information the request cannot be implemented. The IP editor is asked to resubmit the request with the missing information included at their earliest convenience. Regards,  Spintendo  19:29, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]