Template talk:US numbered highways

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Support was weak and especially conditional, and no one made a strong case that renaming would benefit readers. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:03, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:US numbered highways → ? – The current title is associated with the United States Numbered Highway System, and needs to be moved somewhere else to avoid confusion with Template:U.S. Routes. Template:US numbered highways should just redirect to Template:U.S. Routes. 2600:1700:6180:6290:C238:E68F:CC3D:7F06 (talk) 16:48, 24 August 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 19:13, 31 August 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath^talk 05:38, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Probably Template:United States highways. Gonnym (talk) 09:57, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• If anything, Template:Numbered highways in the United States, but honestly, I don't need the need to change this as proposed unless someone is also going to bother editing dozens of articles just to change a piece of coding that readers won't see. There's no visible benefit here. Count me as generally opposed to a change. Imzadi 1979 → 17:16, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject U.S. Roads has been notified of this discussion. TarnishedPath^talk 05:38, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak support for Template:Numbered highways in the United States, if the nom really intends upon retargeting the resulting redirect and fixing all of the transclusions. Otherwise, since this is not reader-facing, so long as editors know the difference between these two templates, I agree with Imzadi that there is no tangible benefit for what would be a large amount of tedious effort. That time is probably better spent elsewhere. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:59, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]