This template is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness
This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be auto-archived by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 4.
Needs to be collapsible
The template clearly has a useful function but it can take up a very large amount of screen space, and in particular it occupies a great length on the right hand side, making image, diagram and table placement difficult. It would be very helpful if the template could have a parameter to allow it to be collapsed where necessary. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:10, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Infoboxes are not collasible. There are widgets that hide IBs (and they don't show on mobile) but you'd need an RFC to change how infoboxes display. Primefac (talk) 23:33, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I agree also, these templates need to be collapsible. They often take up too much space, inappropriately dominating too many articles, particularly small articles. — Epipelagic (talk) 14:06, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Popping in here to agree that this needs to be collapsible, since it takes up an enormous amount of space. Why specifically are they not collapsible? And, where could a request be made to suggest making this kind of change to infoboxes so they allow flexibility of use? Cheers —Kittycataclysm (talk) 23:26, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The one potentially very long (19 lines) section is the amino acid section. I've made it foldable, though the formatting of the fold-title leaves something to be desired. The other potentially troublesome sections are the breakdown of sugars and fats, but they are nowhere as bad as the 19 AAs. Artoria2e5🌉10:00, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the quick work and resolution, Waddie96. The niacin %DV values are now displayed on all the tables I had checked for its absence. I don't understand why this edit was made - is it correct? Zefr (talk) 21:43, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
CloakedFerret - for uniformity, nearly all of the dietary minerals have an article entitled 'x in biology', allowing links in the nutrition table to be directed there; this would put iron, potassium, etc. (see raw link format) in the same context for users clicking on the mineral names. An exception is the phosphorus article, which has a section entitled biological role. Sodium and selenium are not always included in nutrition tables for foods, but can be changed to the 'x in biology' format. Examples of improved wikilinks are here.Zefr (talk) 17:33, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Centre-aligned labels on mobile view appear haphazard