This template is within the scope of WikiProject Abortion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Abortion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AbortionWikipedia:WikiProject AbortionTemplate:WikiProject AbortionAbortion
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women's health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health
In the "Movements" section, there's a general pro & anti section. And there is links to the US pro & anti articles. Should the USA based movements get a "pride of place" section right at the top? There already is a link to Abortion in the United States in the 'Country' section. Is that not sufficient? ____Ebelular (talk) 15:13, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
How many "[country] pro-life/pro-choice movement" articles exist? If there are many, I agree with you - though we could also expand the template to include links to all the existing ones. If we have articles for just the U. S. pro-life and pro-choice movements, it seems to make sense to include links to them especially. Simplebutpowerful05:49, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know how many other "$COUNTRY pro-choice/life" articles there are. There is still links to the US versions if you drill down into the 'Movements' section, or the 'United States' section. ____Ebelular (talk) 09:40, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]