Share to: share facebook share twitter share wa share telegram print page

Tate v. Short

Tate v. Short
Argued January 14, 1971
Decided March 2, 1971
Full case nameTate v. Short
Citations401 U.S. 395 (more)
91 S. Ct. 668; 28 L. Ed. 2d 130
Holding
It is a violation of equal protection to convert a fine to jail time simply because the sentenced person cannot pay the fine.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Warren E. Burger
Associate Justices
Hugo Black · William O. Douglas
John M. Harlan II · William J. Brennan Jr.
Potter Stewart · Byron White
Thurgood Marshall · Harry Blackmun
Case opinions
MajorityBrennan, joined by unanimous
ConcurrenceBlackmun
ConcurrenceBlack
ConcurrenceHarlan

Tate v. Short, 401 U.S. 395 (1971), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held it is a violation of equal protection to convert a fine to jail time simply because the sentenced person cannot pay the fine.[1]

See also

References

  1. ^ Tate v. Short, 401 U.S. 395 (1971).

Further reading

  • "Indigent Defendant-Statutory Fines". Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science. 62 (4): 493–496. 1971. Retrieved June 27, 2025.
  • Barton, Robert W. (1970–1971). "Equal Protection - An Indigent Cannot Be Imprisoned for His Inability to Pay a Fine - Tate v. Short Recent Case". Dickinson Law Review. 75 (3): 528–533. Retrieved June 27, 2025.
  • Denver, James P. (1974). "Conversion of Fine into Imprisionment [sic]: A Violation of Tate or Argersinger or Neither?". Florida Law Review. 26: 630–635. Retrieved June 27, 2025.
  • Lowery, John D. (1971–1972). "Criminal Procedure--Equal Protection--The Dual Impact of Tate v. Short on Default Imprisonment and Monetary Bail Notes". North Carolina Law Review. 50 (1): 136–144. Retrieved June 27, 2025.
Prefix: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia

Kembali kehalaman sebelumnya