Dresden specimen (A) and Hannover specimen (B) of P. geinitzi
The first two specimens of Parasaurus geinitzi were collected from the Zechstein in Dresden and Hannover.[3] The holotype, GZG.V.010.101, is the Hannover specimen and it was discovered by Oberbergrath Jugler in 1849.[2] The Dresden specimen, ThP 279, was first studied by Hanns Bruno Geinitz in 1848,[4] who later recovered it from the ashes of the Zwinger Palace when it was burnt during the Revolutions of 1849.[2]
Hermann von Meyer initially classified the two known specimens within Protorosaurus speneri in 1856,[3] and it was not until 1857 when von Meyer redescribed these fossils and created the Parasaurus genus.[1] In 2008, Tsuji and Müller re-evaluated the genus. They assigned seven specimens to Parasaurus geinitzi,[2] with an eighth being discovered shortly after.[5]
Description
Parasaurus was small for a pareiasaur, only around 50 centimetres (1.6 ft) long. Axial osteoderms appear to be absent. The skull surface is pitted, with small spike-like horns on the supratemporal and quadratojugal.[2]
Phylogeny
von Meyer classified Parasaurus as a reptile but it was classified as a pareiasaur when the family was created in 1888.[6][7] Lee (1997a; 1997b) classified Parasaurus as a nomen dubium.[8][9]
^ abMeyer, H.V. (1857). Beiträge zur näheren Kenntnis fossiler Reptilien. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geognosie, Geologie und Petrefaktenkunde, 1857: 103–104.
^ abcdefgL. A. Tsuji and J. Müller. (2008). A Re-evaluation of Parasaurus geinitzi, the first named pareiasaur (Amniota, Parareptilia). Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 45(10):1111-1121
^ abMeyer, H.V. (1856). Saurier aus dem Kupferschiefer der Zechstein Formation. Zur Fauna der Vorwelt, 3. Abteilung. Verlag von H.Keller, Frankfurt am Main.
^Geinitz, H.B. (1848). Die Versteinerungen des deutschen Zechsteingebirges. In Die Verteinerungen des Zechsteingebirges und Rothliegenden oder des permischen Systemes in Sachsen. Edited by H.B. Geinitz and A. von Gutbier. Arnoldische Buchhandlung, Dresden and Leipzig, pp. 1–29. Google Scholar
^H. G. Seeley. (1888). Croonian Lecture: Researches on the Structure, Organization, and Classification of the Fossil Reptilia. II. On Pareiasaurus bombidens (Owen), and the Significance of Its Affinities to Amphibians, Reptiles, and Mammals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 179:59-109
^Lee, M.S.Y. (1997a). A taxonomic revision of pareiasaurian reptiles:implications for Permian terrestrial palaeoecology. Modern Geology, 21: 231–298.
^Lee, M.S.Y. (1997b). Pareiasaur phylogeny and the origin of turtles. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 120: 197–280.doi:10.1111/j.10963642.1997.tb01279.x.
^Tsuji, L. A.; Sidor, C. A.; Steyer, J. - S. B.; Smith, R. M. H.; Tabor, N. J.; Ide, O. (2013). "The vertebrate fauna of the Upper Permian of Niger—VII. Cranial anatomy and relationships of Bunostegos akokanensis (Pareiasauria)". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 33 (4): 747–763. doi:10.1080/02724634.2013.739537. S2CID86097405.