It is
proposed that this article be deleted because of the following concern:
Plenty of coverage, but only as a sentence or two in a larger text about bowling scoring, which is conveniently what we already have in the Wikipedia page for tenpin bowling, therefore no need for a standalone page. (proposed by JustARandomSquid)
If you can address this concern by improving, copyediting, sourcing, renaming, or merging the page, please edit this page and do so. You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason. Although not required, you are encouraged to explain why you object to the deletion, either in your edit summary or on the talk page. If this template is removed, do not replace it.
The article may be deleted if this message remains in place for seven days, i.e., after 07:55, 20 September 2025 (UTC).
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article so that it is acceptable according to the deletion policy.
Find sources: "Open frame" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTORPROD
Expired+%5B%5BWP%3APROD%7CPROD%5D%5D%2C+concern+was%3A+Plenty+of+coverage%2C+but+only+as+a+sentence+or+two+in+a+larger+text+about+bowling+scoring%2C+which+is+conveniently+what+we+already+have+in+the+Wikipedia+page+for+%5B%5Btenpin+bowling%5D%5D%2C+therefore+no+need+for+a+standalone+page.
Expired [[WP:PROD|prod]], concern was: Plenty of coverage, but only as a sentence or two in a larger text about bowling scoring, which is conveniently what we already have in the Wikipedia page for
tenpin bowling, therefore no need for a standalone page.
