In April 2011, Exelon of Chicago announced its intention to purchase Constellation Energy, the owner and operator of Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station. The acquisition was approved by FERC and the companies officially combined on March 12, 2012, with Constellation Energy taking the Exelon name. Exelon separated its generating assets back into Constellation Energy in 2022. Constellation owns Unit 1 and holds 82% of Unit 2 while Long Island Power Authority holds 18%. Constellation Energy is the sole operator of both Units 1 and 2. Both units are boiling water reactors (BWRs).
Units 1 and 2
Unit 1 of Nine Mile Point Nuclear Generating Station c. 1969
Both units are General Electricboiling water reactors (BWR). Unit 1, a BWR-2 (Generation 2), went online in 1969 and has a rated capacity of 644 megawatts (864,000 hp). It is the oldest operating commercial nuclear reactor still in service in the United States.[2] Unit 2, a BWR-5, has been in operation since 1988 and has a rated capacity of 1,375 MW. Construction of both units, along with neighboring Fitzpatrick, was commissioned by Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation. Fitzpatrick was sold immediately upon completion, while Niagara Mohawk retained its share of the Nine Mile Point units until 2001, when it sold them to Constellation.[3]
On October 31, 2006, Constellation announced that the NRC had granted 20-year license extensions to both units. Unit 1 is now licensed to operate until 2029, and Unit 2 is licensed until 2046.[citation needed]
The Nine Mile Point 2 cooling tower is 543 feet tall and is visible from Chimney Bluffs in Sodus, New York nearly 30 miles away. Nine Mile Point 1 draws cooling water from Lake Ontario, and does not have a cooling tower.[citation needed]
In early May 2011, the plant operator reported that the plant fuel supplier, General Electric, notified the operator that mathematical errors could've resulted in the reactor's fuel getting hotter than expected.[4]
In 2016, Governor of New YorkAndrew Cuomo directed the Public Service Commission to consider ratepayer-financed subsidies similar to those for renewable sources to keep nuclear power stations profitable in the competition against natural gas. Indian Point would not be included in the scheme.[5][6]
Generation (MWh) of Nine Mile Point Nuclear Generating Station[9]
Year
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Annual (total)
2001
1,309,751
1,082,371
996,634
792,703
839,639
1,213,015
1,042,234
1,165,283
1,233,386
1,197,046
1,259,445
1,098,455
13,229,962
2002
1,301,564
1,183,386
857,629
772,513
1,226,472
1,250,520
1,272,099
1,255,248
1,243,747
1,260,796
888,453
730,464
13,242,891
2003
1,318,106
1,086,660
1,037,882
838,868
1,219,947
1,226,521
1,068,496
1,016,544
1,244,842
1,288,636
1,221,228
1,298,812
13,866,542
2004
1,132,313
1,174,594
791,970
495,639
1,249,267
1,236,082
1,282,314
1,248,743
1,163,039
1,268,515
1,271,877
1,287,183
13,601,536
2005
1,317,483
1,188,926
1,101,125
826,387
1,214,595
1,232,033
1,264,159
1,237,864
1,235,761
1,303,254
1,271,780
1,314,381
14,507,748
2006
1,311,929
1,157,117
845,319
884,828
1,305,932
1,181,231
1,278,746
1,279,037
1,253,733
1,302,056
1,268,169
1,316,237
14,384,334
2007
1,317,419
1,153,677
826,238
1,032,859
1,218,774
1,246,426
1,276,739
1,244,518
1,208,667
1,291,728
847,849
1,299,130
13,964,024
2008
1,316,569
1,225,699
1,037,712
787,827
1,297,804
1,237,640
1,268,441
1,279,355
1,243,369
1,232,911
1,150,627
1,309,769
14,387,723
2009
1,316,673
1,169,505
1,129,488
1,083,746
1,309,346
1,255,222
1,286,215
1,277,742
1,249,653
1,253,744
1,268,150
1,315,012
14,914,496
2010
1,185,280
1,167,767
1,312,218
494,373
1,189,133
1,243,776
1,279,385
1,285,670
1,249,015
1,298,050
1,214,643
1,319,743
14,239,053
2011
1,310,649
1,178,658
1,120,852
941,175
1,048,935
1,258,797
1,275,745
1,093,570
1,247,499
1,305,602
1,272,676
1,101,461
14,155,619
2012
1,316,184
1,130,245
1,304,973
658,199
461,139
881,195
1,154,809
1,387,521
1,275,120
1,351,902
961,481
1,282,495
13,165,263
2013
1,435,237
1,289,866
1,433,301
1,131,870
1,163,963
1,368,731
1,344,741
1,396,820
1,358,815
1,415,931
1,327,719
1,179,339
15,846,333
2014
1,415,857
1,288,293
959,694
486,946
1,360,306
1,344,023
1,402,344
1,398,963
1,347,028
1,420,433
1,386,105
1,429,188
15,239,180
2015
1,432,717
1,123,379
1,166,683
1,194,851
1,410,404
1,366,225
1,396,404
1,387,647
1,284,343
1,427,155
1,386,181
1,422,087
15,998,076
2016
1,434,258
1,339,141
1,426,035
754,831
1,245,904
1,362,014
1,390,660
1,388,618
1,356,487
1,410,925
1,152,424
1,239,075
15,500,372
2017
1,387,866
1,212,679
1,171,443
1,296,298
1,419,287
1,361,709
1,365,672
1,269,240
1,313,158
1,408,117
1,361,625
1,425,786
15,992,880
2018
1,425,422
1,284,109
1,364,805
888,698
900,404
1,290,409
1,386,302
1,295,057
1,345,935
1,407,026
1,374,831
1,419,832
15,382,830
2019
1,423,364
1,257,891
1,149,066
926,790
1,328,362
1,364,304
1,388,799
1,388,538
1,436,064
1,370,496
1,368,169
1,419,533
15,821,376
2020
1,428,083
1,283,107
567,783
1,223,820
1,423,323
1,361,161
1,383,881
1,384,509
1,356,053
1,415,070
1,382,224
1,431,594
15,640,608
2021
1,433,988
1,274,512
1,256,094
1,201,383
1,411,935
1,352,044
1,393,758
1,373,978
1,353,074
1,387,225
1,354,343
1,414,058
16,206,392
2022
1,410,894
1,186,409
701,970
1,224,682
1,399,041
1,345,947
1,375,176
1,367,515
951,058
1,406,944
1,370,138
1,421,057
15,790,831
2023
1,404,444
1,223,276
1,081,005
1,044,150
1,402,944
1,348,818
1,366,713
1,376,229
1,143,531
1,375,447
1,347,764
1,392,580
15,506,901
2024
1,395,521
1,299,025
655,002
1,367,327
1,404,158
1,347,168
1,376,491
1,381,349
1,180,294
1,397,757
1,313,474
1,366,977
15,484,543
2025
1,357,778
1,219,753
1,127,879
1,272,962
1,411,556
1,354,710
1,377,474
--
Surrounding population
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission defines two emergency planning zones around nuclear power plants: a plume exposure pathway zone with a radius of 10 miles (16 km), concerned primarily with exposure to, and inhalation of, airborne radioactive contamination, and an ingestion pathway zone of about 50 miles (80 km), concerned primarily with ingestion of food and liquid contaminated by radioactivity.[10]
The 2010 U.S. population within 10 miles (16 km) of Nine Mile Point was 35,632, an increase of 17.0 percent in a decade, according to an analysis of U.S. Census data for msnbc.com. The 2010 U.S. population within 50 miles (80 km) was 909,523, an increase of 3.2 percent since 2000. Cities within 50 miles include Syracuse (36 miles to city center).[11]
1991 site area emergency
On August 13, 1991, a "site area emergency" was declared at the plant. According to Time magazine, this was the third occasion an SAE had been declared at a US nuclear plant.[12]
The emergency was due to an electrical fault which caused a momentary loss of electrical power to the reactor and control room. The operators shut down the reactor in accordance with the emergency plan requirements. There were no injuries or release of radiation as a result of the incident.[13] The reactor left emergency procedures about 13 hours after initiation.
The facility was operating at full power when a phase-to-ground electrical fault occurred on phase B of the Unit 2 main power transformer. This resulted in a trip of the main generator, main turbine, and reactor. The fault also caused the voltage on electrical distribution phase B buses to drop to about half of its nominal value for approximately 200 milliseconds, after which it returned to normal.
This momentary voltage drop resulted in the simultaneous loss of power output from each of the five Non-Class 1E uninterruptible power supplies. Exide's UPS units have internal continuously charged back-up batteries to prevent a loss of control logic power. Exide's UPS control logic circuitry receives, processes, generates, and sends electrical signals essential for proper UPS operation. However, in this incident the back-up power battery packs were apparently past their useful life and were completely discharged.
The loss of power from the UPS units caused a loss of all the following: the control room annunciators, the safety parameter display system computer, control rod position indication, the plant process computer, the core thermal limits computer, the feedwater control system, some of the lighting for the plant, the plant radio and paging systems, some instrumentation for balance-of-plant systems, and some instrument recorders.
The loss of control room annunciators concurrent with the plant transient resulting from automatic tripping of the main generator, main turbine, and reactor caused the licensee (Niagara Mohawk) to declare a site area emergency in accordance with the site emergency plan. The loss of control rod position indicators and other equipment losses burdened the operators in implementing the emergency procedures. However, the operators shut down the plant in accordance with emergency procedures. About 13 hours after the plant trip, the reactor was placed in a cold shutdown condition; and approximately 1 hour later, the licensee ended the site area emergency.
Seismic risk
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's estimate of the risk each year of an earthquake intense enough to cause core damage to the reactor at Nine Mile Point was Reactor 1: 1 in 238,095; Reactor 2: 1 in 178,571, according to an NRC study published in August 2010.[14][15]