This is a dynamic list and may never be able to satisfy particular standards for completeness. You can help by editing the page to add missing items, with references to reliable sources.
Here are some of the more commonly known problems that are PSPACE-complete when expressed as decision problems. This list is in no way comprehensive.
succinct versions of many graph problems, with graphs represented as Boolean circuits,[43] ordered binary decision diagrams[44] or other related representations:
s-t reachability problem for succinct graphs. This is essentially the same as the simplest plan existence problem in automated planning and scheduling.
Node Kayles game and clique-forming game:[49] two players alternately select vertices and the induced subgraph must be an independent set (resp. clique). The last to play wins.
The Corridor Tiling Problem: given a set of Wang tiles, a chosen tile and a width given in unary notation, is there any height such that an rectangle can be tiled such that all the border tiles are ?[54][55]
^Aviezri S. Fraenkel (1978). "The complexity of checkers on an N x N board - preliminary report". Proceedings of the 19th Annual Symposium on Computer Science: 55–64.
^Erik D. Demaine (2009). The complexity of the Dyson Telescope Puzzle. Vol. Games of No Chance 3.
^ abRobert A. Hearn (2008). "Amazons, Konane, and Cross Purposes are PSPACE-complete". Games of No Chance 3.
^ abcHearn; Demaine (2002). "PSPACE-Completeness of Sliding-Block Puzzles and Other Problems through the Nondeterministic Constraint Logic Model of Computation". arXiv:cs.CC/0205005.
^Gilbert, Lengauer, and R. E. Tarjan: The Pebbling Problem is Complete in Polynomial Space. SIAM Journal on Computing, Volume 9, Issue 3, 1980, pages 513-524.
^ abTakumi Kasai, Akeo Adachi, and Shigeki Iwata: Classes of Pebble Games and Complete Problems, SIAM Journal on Computing, Volume 8, 1979, pages 574-586.
^L. J. Stockmeyer and A. R. Meyer. Word problems requiring exponential time. In Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 1–9, 1973.
^Antonio Lozano and Jose L. Balcazar. The complexity of graph problems for succinctly represented graphs. In Manfred Nagl, editor, Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science, 15th International Workshop, WG'89, number 411 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 277–286. Springer-Verlag, 1990.
^J. Feigenbaum and S. Kannan and M. Y. Vardi and M. Viswanathan, Complexity of Problems on Graphs Represented as OBDDs, Chicago Journal of Theoretical Computer Science, vol 5, no 5, 1999.
^C.H. Papadimitriou; M. Yannakakis (1989). "Shortest paths without a map". Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Proc. 16th ICALP. Vol. 372. Springer-Verlag. pp. 610–620.
^I. Chades; J. Carwardine; T.G. Martin; S. Nicol; R. Sabbadin; O. Buffet (2012). MOMDPs: A Solution for Modelling Adaptive Management Problems. AAAI'12.
^P.W. Goldberg and C.H. Papadimitriou and R. Savani (2011). The Complexity of the Homotopy Method, Equilibrium Selection, and Lemke–Howson Solutions. Proc. 52nd FOCS. IEEE. pp. 67–76.
^Maarten Marx (2007). "Complexity of Modal Logic". In Patrick Blackburn; Johan F.A.K. van Benthem; Frank Wolter (eds.). Handbook of Modal Logic. Elsevier. p. 170.
^Lewis, Harry R. (1978). Complexity of solvable cases of the decision problem for the predicate calculus. 19th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. IEEE. pp. 35–47.