Gøsta Esping-Andersen[a] (born 24 November 1947)[2] is a Danish sociologist whose primary focus has been on the welfare state and its place in capitalist economies. Jacob Hacker describes him as the "dean of welfare state scholars".[3] Over the past decade his research has moved towards family demographic issues. A synthesis of his work was published as Families in the 21st Century (Stockholm, SNS, 2016).
Esping-Andersen completed his doctoral studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, writing a dissertation under the supervision of Gerald Marwell. While at Madison, Esping-Andersen also studied with Erik Olin Wright and Aage B. Sørensen, as well as Maurice Zeitlin, who mentored Esping-Andersen until his departure from the University of Wisconsin in 1977.[1][5]
Esping-Andersen (1990) challenges theories that argue capitalist welfare states tend to become increasingly uniform due to the assumed logic of industrialization. He identifies a connection between the degree of decommodification—the extent to which individuals can maintain their well-being without relying on the market—regarding pensions, healthcare, and unemployment benefits, as well as labor market policies, and the nature of the political regime in 18 member states of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). He categorizes political regimes based on three key factors:
The extent of left-wing influence and working-class organization within the government,
The level of electoral support for Catholic conservatism,
The presence of an authoritarian past or historical restrictions on voting rights.[6]
His most influential and highly cited book titled The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism[7][8] was published in 1990 and laid out three main types of welfare states, in which modern developed capitalist nations cluster based on these criteria:[b]
Liberal welfare states are characterized by a lack of strong working-class mobilization and an absence of an absolutist political history. These systems primarily rely on means-tested benefits, offering limited social insurance while actively promoting private welfare provisions. Notable examples include the United States, Canada, and Australia.
Conservative corporatist welfare states are influenced by a Catholic conservative tradition and have a history of political absolutism. They prioritize social insurance schemes over means-tested assistance or private benefits, yet they limit income redistribution. Countries such as Austria, Italy, France, and Germany exemplify this model.
Socialist (or social democratic) welfare states are distinguished by significant working-class participation in governance and the presence of influential social democratic parties. These states implement comprehensive welfare policies that emphasize income redistribution and incorporate labor market strategies to support unemployed individuals.[6]
Other sociologists and political scientists went on to apply his theoretical analysis to the real world. One such example is a book entitled Real Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, written by Robert E. Goodin, Bruce Headey, Ruud Muffels, and Henk-Jan Dirven.[9] While some critics claim Esping-Andersen's categories are becoming outdated, many political scientists are attracted by its intuitive simplicity.
In the past decade, his research has moved to demographic issues and in particular to the consequences of women's changing roles. He has developed a multiple equilibrium framework for the understanding of changing family behaviour. See in particular his Families in the 21st Century and Esping-Andersen and Billari (2015) and Retheorizing family demographic change. Population and Development Review (2015).
Criticism
The evolving nature of welfare states often makes it difficult to categorize. Arguably, many welfare states have components from some or all typologies, making them more akin to points on a continuum rather than rigid typologies, a fact Esping-Andersen acknowledges in his writings.
According to the French sociologist Georges Menahem, Esping-Andersen's "decommodification index" aggregates both qualitative and quantitative variables for ”sets of dimensions” which are fluid, and pertain to three very different areas. Similarly, Menahem has concerns regarding the validity of the index, and its potential for replication.[10]
In 1996, the Italian social scientist Maurizio Ferrera further developed Esping-Andersen's Worlds of Welfare by identifying a fourth subtype of the welfare state model, the Southern European Model of Welfare.[11]
Bibliography
Books
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (1980). Social class, social democracy and state policy: party policy and party decomposition in Denmark and Sweden. Copenhagen: Institute of Organization and Industrial Sociology. ISBN9788770341790.
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta; Zeitlin, Maurice; Friedland, Roger (1982). Political power and social theory: a research annual, volume 3. Greenwich, Connecticut: Jai Press Inc. ISBN9780892322046.
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta; Rein, Martin; Rainwater, Lee (1987). Stagnation and renewal in social policy: the rise and fall of policy regimes. Armonk, New York: M.E. Sharpe. ISBN9780873323901.
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. ISBN9780069028573.
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (1993). Changing classes stratification and mobility in post-industrial societies. London Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications. ISBN9781849208253.
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (1996). Welfare states in transition national adaptations in global economies. London Thousand Oaks, California: Sage. ISBN9780857021861.
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (1999). Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN9780198742005.
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta; Regini, Marino (2000). Why deregulate labour markets. Oxford UK New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN9780199240524.
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta; Gallie, Duncan; Hemerijck, Anton; Myles, John (2002). Why we need a new welfare state. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN9780199256433.
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (2007). Family formation and family dilemmas in contemporary Europe. Bilbao Spain: Fundación BBVA. ISBN9788496515352.
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (2009). The incomplete revolution: adapting to women's new roles. Cambridge, UK Malden, Massachusetts: Polity. ISBN9780745643168.
Esping-Andersen, Gosta (2016) Families in the 21st Century (Stockholm, SNS).
^It is important to note that these categories have little to do with the contemporary labels of American politics, and rather have much more to do with general political theory.
References
^ abEsping-Andersen, Gøsta (1978). Social Class, Social Democracy and State Policy: Parity Policy and Party Decomposition in Denmark and Sweden (doctoral dissertation). University of Wisconsin-Madison. pp. ii–iii. OCLC705977095. ProQuest302910232.
^"Esping-Andersen, Gøsta, 1947–". Library of Congress. Retrieved 4 January 2015. pub. info sheet (b. 11/24/47, Naestved, Denmark; Ph.D., 1978, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, sociology; Dept. of Sociology, Harvard Univ., assoc. prof., Cambridge, Mass.)
^Hacker, Jacob (2005). "Policy Drift: The Hidden Politics of US Welfare State Retrenchment". Beyond continuity:institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford University Press.
^Olsen, Gregg M.; O'Connor, Julia S. (December 1998). "Introduction Understanding the Welfare State: Power Resources Theory and Its Critics". In O'Connor, Julia S.; Olsen, Gregg M. (eds.). Power Resource Theory and the Welfare State: A Critical Approach. University of Toronto Press. pp. 1–34. doi:10.3138/9781442678675-004. ISBN9781442678675.
^ abBurden, Tom (1998). Social policy and welfare: a clear guide. London: Pluto. p. 6. ISBN978-0-7453-0965-1.
^Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. ISBN9780069028573.
^Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (1990). "4 the Three Political Economies of the Welfare State". International Journal of Sociology. 20 (3): 92–123. doi:10.1080/15579336.1990.11770001. hdl:1814/22934.