2024 California Proposition 3

U.S. Senate
U.S. Senate
	1849; 1850; 1852 sp; 1856; 1857 sp; 1860; 1860 sp; 1868; 1872; 1873; 1873 sp; 1878; 1880; 1885; 1886 sp; 1887; 1891; 1891 sp; 1893; 1895 sp; 1897; 1900 sp; 1903; 1905; 1909; 1911; 1914; 1916; 1920; 1922; 1926; 1928; 1932; 1934; 1938; 1940; 1944; 1946; 1946 sp; 1950; 1952; 1954 sp; 1956; 1958; 1962; 1964; 1968; 1970; 1974; 1976; 1980; 1982; 1986; 1988; 1992; 1992 sp; 1994; 1998; 2000; 2004; 2006; 2010; 2012; 2016; 2018; 2022; 2022 sp; 2024; 2024 sp; 2028; 2030;

U.S. President
U.S. President
	1852; 1856; 1860; 1864; 1868; 1872; 1876; 1880; 1884; 1888; 1892; 1896; 1900; 1904; 1908; 1912; 1916; 1920; 1924; 1928; 1932; 1936; 1940; 1944; 1948; 1952; 1956; 1960; 1964; 1968; 1972; 1976; 1980; 1984; 1988; 1992; 1996 Dem; Rep; ; 2000 Dem; Rep; ; 2004 Dem; Rep; ; 2008 Dem; Rep; ; 2012 Dem; Rep; ; 2016 Dem; Rep; ; 2020 Dem; Rep; ; 2024 Dem; Rep; ;

Proposition 3
Constitutional Right to Marry; Amends California Constitution to recognize fundamental right to marry, regardless of sex or race. Removes language in California Constitution stating that marriage is only between a man and a woman.
Results
Yes 80–90% 70–80% 60–70% 50–60%	No 60–70% 50–60%
	Source: Statement of Vote at the Wayback Machine (archived February 10, 2025)

Proposition 3, titled Constitutional Right to Marry, was a California ballot proposition that passed by vote in the 2024 general election on November 5, 2024.^[1]^[2] The proposition repealed Proposition 8, passed during the 2008 general election, and amended the state constitution to protect same-sex marriage. It also ensured that same-sex couples would have the right to marry in California in case the United States Supreme Court ever overturns Obergefell v. Hodges, thus making it a symbolic gesture until then.^[3]^[4]

Text

The proposition amended Article I, Section 7.5 of the Constitution of California to read:

~~"Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.~~ (a) The right to marry is a fundamental right. (b) This section is in furtherance of both of the following: (1) The inalienable rights to enjoy life and liberty and to pursue and obtain safety, happiness, and privacy guaranteed by Section 1. (2) The rights to due process and equal protection guaranteed by Section 7."

Results

On November 5, 2024, at 8:00 PM PT, polls in California closed. With 62.6% in favor, Proposition 3 was approved.^[5]

Support

Supporters of the proposition argued that "although marriage equality for same-sex couples has been the law of the land in the United States for years, California’s Constitution still says that same-sex couples are not allowed to marry [and that] recent threats against fundamental rights have made it clear California must be proactive in protecting the freedom to marry regardless of gender or race"

Supporters

Statewide officials

Gavin Newsom, Governor of California (2019–present)^[6]

State legislators

Toni Atkins, state senator from the 39th district (2016–present) and former president pro tempore (2018–2024)^[7]
Scott Wiener, state senator from the 11th district (2016–present)^[8]
Evan Low, state assemblyman from the 26th district (2014–2024)^[8]
Chris Ward, state assemblyman from the 78th district (2020–present)^[7]

Local officials

Todd Gloria, mayor of San Diego (2020–present)^[7]

Political parties

Newspapers

Organizations

ACLU of Northern California^[1]
Equality California^[22]
Human Rights Campaign^[1]
Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California^[1]
TransLatina Coalition^[1]

Opposition

Opponents of the proposition argued that it "removes ALL protections on marriage, including limits on children, close relatives, and three or more people marrying each other" as well as "[overriding] all laws on marriage [and a] 'fundamental right' to marry [meaning] it would remove protections against child marriages, incest, and polygamy" and that "changing the definition of marriage, this measure also suggests that children don’t need both a mom and a dad [as Prop 3] goes against years of research showing that kids do best when raised by their mother and father in a stable, married home [and that] children without a mother or father are more likely to have emotional issues, take part in risky behaviors, struggle in school, and face financial problems."

Opponents

Organizations

The American Council for Evangelicals^[8]
California Capitol Connection^[1]
California Family Council^[1]
Concerned Women for America Legislative Action Committee^[1]
Freedom in Action^[1]
Real Impact^[1]

Polling

Date of opinion poll	Conducted by	Sample size	In favor	Against	Undecided	Margin	Margin of Error
October 2024^[23]	Public Policy Institute of California		67%	32%		35% pro
September 2024^[24]	Public Policy Institute of California		68%	31%		37% pro
January 21, 2023 - January 29, 2024^[25]	University of Southern California	1,416	73%	20%	7%	53% pro	±4%